People v. Caba

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Caba

134 A.D.2d 506, 521 N.Y.S.2d 403, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50700

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 23, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 134 A.D.2d 506 (People v. Caba) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Caba, 134 A.D.2d 506, 521 N.Y.S.2d 403, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50700 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Matthews, J.), rendered November 1, 1984, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, manslaughter in the first degree [507]*507and assault in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, as we must on appeal, we find that it was legally sufficient to support the defendant’s conviction (see, People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755, cert denied 469 US 932). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the defendant’s guilt was established beyond a reasonable doubt and that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Brown, J. P., Eiber, Kunzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Matthews, J.), rendered November 1, 1984, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, manslaughter in the first degree [507]*507and assault in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, as we must on appeal, we find that it was legally sufficient to support the defendant’s conviction (see, People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755, cert denied 469 US 932). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the defendant’s guilt was established beyond a reasonable doubt and that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Brown, J. P., Eiber, Kunzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 A.D.2d 506, 521 N.Y.S.2d 403, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-caba-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack