People v. Bynum

2024 NY Slip Op 01556
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 20, 2024·No. Ind. No. 72530/21·Published

Opinion

People v Bynum (2024 NY Slip Op 01556)
People v Bynum
2024 NY Slip Op 01556
Decided on March 20, 2024
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 20, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
HECTOR D. LASALLE, P.J.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
HELEN VOUTSINAS
JANICE A. TAYLOR, JJ.

2022-09665
(Ind. No. 72530/21)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Tyreik Bynum, appellant.


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Elisabeth R. Calcaterra of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Ann Bordley of counsel; Darci Wen Siegel on the brief), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rhonda Tomlinson, J.), rendered November 22, 2022, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by vacating the imposition of a mandatory surcharge and fees; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that Penal Law § 265.03 is unconstitutional in light of the decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v Bruen (597 US 1), is unpreserved for appellate review, as the defendant failed to raise a constitutional challenge before the Supreme Court (see People v Manners, 217 AD3d 683, 685), and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see People v Fulton, 222 AD3d 991, 992; People v Moise, 220 AD3d 811, 811).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

As consented to by the People, and pursuant to the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction, we modify the judgment by vacating the surcharge and fees imposed on the defendant at sentencing (see CPL 420.35[2-a][c]; People v Jaaber, 223 AD3d 685).

LASALLE, P.J., CHAMBERS, VOUTSINAS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bynum, 2024 NY Slip Op 01556 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2024).

2024 NY Slip Op 01556 (People v. Bynum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Manners
217 A.D.3d 683 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
People v. Moise
220 A.D.3d 811 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
People v. Fulton
200 N.Y.S.3d 112 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
People v. Jaaber
223 A.D.3d 685 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)