People v. Buzzo

California Supreme Court

People v. Buzzo

59 Cal. 399

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 15, 1881

DocketNo. 10,670

StatusPublished

This text of 59 Cal. 399 (People v. Buzzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Buzzo, 59 Cal. 399 (Cal. 1881).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court:

The defendant was prosecuted in the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, for the crime of grand larceny, and was convicted of said crime. He applied to the Court for a new trial on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to justify the verdict, and his application was granted. This appeal is on behalf of the people from the order of the Court below granting the defendant a new trial.

It was conceded by the Attorney General on the hearing of the appeal, that the evidence did not sustain the verdict, and that therefore the motion for a new trial was properly granted by the Superior Court.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court:

The defendant was prosecuted in the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, for the crime of grand larceny, and was convicted of said crime. He applied to the Court for a new trial on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to justify the verdict, and his application was granted. This appeal is on behalf of the people from the order of the Court below granting the defendant a new trial.

It was conceded by the Attorney General on the hearing of the appeal, that the evidence did not sustain the verdict, and that therefore the motion for a new trial was properly granted by the Superior Court.

Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 Cal. 399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-buzzo-cal-1881.