People v. Bushuyeva

130 A.D.3d 840, 12 N.Y.S.3d 552
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 15, 2015
Docket2012-09658
StatusPublished

This text of 130 A.D.3d 840 (People v. Bushuyeva) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Bushuyeva, 130 A.D.3d 840, 12 N.Y.S.3d 552 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Appeals by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from three sentences of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Chin Brandt, J.), all imposed June 25, 2012, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.

Ordered that the sentences are affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of her right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248 [2006]; People v Santana, 122 AD3d 949 [2014]; People v Contreras, 112 AD3d 649 [2013]) and, thus, does not preclude review of her excessive sentence claim. However, the sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Rivera, Hall, Hinds-Radix and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Santana
122 A.D.3d 949 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Contreras
112 A.D.3d 649 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
130 A.D.3d 840, 12 N.Y.S.3d 552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bushuyeva-nyappdiv-2015.