People v. Burts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Burts

237 A.D.2d 155, 655 N.Y.S.2d 11, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2421

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 13, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 237 A.D.2d 155 (People v. Burts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Burts, 237 A.D.2d 155, 655 N.Y.S.2d 11, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2421 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Rettinger, J.), rendered May 24, 1994, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted robbery in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent prison terms of 2 to 4 years and 1 year, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s challenge for cause to a prospective juror who had initially expressed a desire to hear defendant’s testimony. The prospective juror did not demonstrate bias toward defendant or indicate that she would be unable to render an impartial verdict (see, People v Hernandez, 222 AD2d 696, lv denied 88 NY2d 986; People v Archer, 210 AD2d 241, lv denied 84 NY2d 1028), and the totality of her responses indicated an ability to decide the case impartially (see, People v DeHoyas, 234 AD2d 147; People v Middleton, 220 AD2d 202, lv denied 87 NY2d 848). Concur—Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Rettinger, J.), rendered May 24, 1994, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted robbery in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent prison terms of 2 to 4 years and 1 year, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s challenge for cause to a prospective juror who had initially expressed a desire to hear defendant’s testimony. The prospective juror did not demonstrate bias toward defendant or indicate that she would be unable to render an impartial verdict (see, People v Hernandez, 222 AD2d 696, lv denied 88 NY2d 986; People v Archer, 210 AD2d 241, lv denied 84 NY2d 1028), and the totality of her responses indicated an ability to decide the case impartially (see, People v DeHoyas, 234 AD2d 147; People v Middleton, 220 AD2d 202, lv denied 87 NY2d 848). Concur—Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach and Nardelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

237 A.D.2d 155, 655 N.Y.S.2d 11, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-burts-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack