People v. Burton

278 A.D.2d 910, 718 N.Y.S.2d 684, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13561
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 27, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was not denied a fair trial by the prospective jury’s brief and inadvertent viewing of defendant in shackles outside the courtroom during jury selection (see, People v Harper, 47 NY2d 857, 857-858; People v Dugan, 238 AD2d 922, 923, lv denied 90 NY2d 857). Contrary to defendant’s contention, reversal is not required based on the question to a witness regarding uncharged criminal conduct by defendant. County Court sustained defendant’s objection to the question before the witness answered it, thereby alleviating any prejudice to defendant (see, People v Santiago, 52 NY2d 865, 866). Defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for our review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to exercise our power to review it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). (Appeal from Judgment of Livingston County Court, Alonzo, J. — Rape, 2nd Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Burton, 278 A.D.2d 910, 718 N.Y.S.2d 684, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13561 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

278 A.D.2d 910 (People v. Burton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Marzug
280 A.D.2d 974 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)