People v. Burtman

2019 NY Slip Op 3223

• Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
• Decided: April 26, 2019
• Docket: 546 KA 17-01330
• Status: Published

Opinion

People v Burtman (2019 NY Slip Op 03223)

People v Burtman

2019 NY Slip Op 03223

Decided on April 26, 2019

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on April 26, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.

546 KA 17-01330

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

CHERI BURTMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (CAITLIN M. CONNELLY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LORI PETTIT RIEMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LITTLE VALLEY (AMBER L. KERLING OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Cattaraugus County Court (Ronald D. Ploetz, J.), rendered April 3, 2017. The judgment convicted defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fourth degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her upon her plea of guilty of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fourth degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 220.34 [1]). Contrary to defendant's contention, the record establishes that she knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived the right to appeal (see generally People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]), and that valid waiver forecloses any challenge by defendant to the severity of the sentence (see id. at 255; see generally People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827 [1998]; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]).

Entered: April 26, 2019

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court