People v. Burrus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Burrus

136 A.D.3d 484, 24 N.Y.S.3d 509

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 9, 2016

Docket1769/12 190 2429/12 189

StatusPublished

This text of 136 A.D.3d 484 (People v. Burrus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Burrus, 136 A.D.3d 484, 24 N.Y.S.3d 509 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeals having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from the judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. McLaughlin, J.), rendered October 16, 2012, said appeals having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.

Concur— Friedman, J.P., Acosta, Andrias, Saxe and Feinman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeals having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from the judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. McLaughlin, J.), rendered October 16, 2012, said appeals having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.

Concur— Friedman, J.P., Acosta, Andrias, Saxe and Feinman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 A.D.3d 484, 24 N.Y.S.3d 509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-burrus-nyappdiv-2016.