People v. Burns

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Burns

259 A.D.2d 491, 684 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2020

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 1, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 259 A.D.2d 491 (People v. Burns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Burns, 259 A.D.2d 491, 684 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2020 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Cacciabaudo, J.), rendered January 8, 1998, convicting him of murder in the second degree and manslaughter in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the accusatory instruments were not jurisdictionally defective (see, People v Alejandro, 70 NY2d 133). Furthermore, having been sentenced in accordance with his plea agreement, the defendant cannot now complain that the sentence was excessive (see, People v Burk, 181 AD2d 74; People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Miller, J. P., Thompson, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Cacciabaudo, J.), rendered January 8, 1998, convicting him of murder in the second degree and manslaughter in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the accusatory instruments were not jurisdictionally defective (see, People v Alejandro, 70 NY2d 133). Furthermore, having been sentenced in accordance with his plea agreement, the defendant cannot now complain that the sentence was excessive (see, People v Burk, 181 AD2d 74; People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Miller, J. P., Thompson, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D.2d 491, 684 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2020, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-burns-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack