People v. Burney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Burney

210 A.D.2d 1001, 621 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13577

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 23, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 210 A.D.2d 1001 (People v. Burney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Burney, 210 A.D.2d 1001, 621 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13577 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor excessive. We have reviewed the contentions of defendant advanced in his supplemental pro se brief, and we conclude that, except for his contention that he was denied effective assistance of counsel, those contentions were waived by defendant’s guilty plea (see, People v Gerber, 182 AD2d 252, lv denied 80 NY2d 1026). Finally, we reject the contention of defendant that he was denied effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 146-147). (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J.—Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 5th Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Pine, Lawton, Doerr and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor excessive. We have reviewed the contentions of defendant advanced in his supplemental pro se brief, and we conclude that, except for his contention that he was denied effective assistance of counsel, those contentions were waived by defendant’s guilty plea (see, People v Gerber, 182 AD2d 252, lv denied 80 NY2d 1026). Finally, we reject the contention of defendant that he was denied effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 146-147). (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J.—Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 5th Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Pine, Lawton, Doerr and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

210 A.D.2d 1001, 621 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13577, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-burney-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack