People v. Burnett
This text of 81 A.D.2d 868 (People v. Burnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered May 7, 1980, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. Notwithstanding that evidence of a line-up was suppressed because of the suggestive procedure employed, it was not error to permit in-court identifications to be made. A sufficient basis existed in both the complainant’s and a second witness’ observations of the defendant during and immediately after the crime. The question whether a sufficient basis was established is a factual one, and the conditions surrounding the observations, the lengths of time, and the absence of any prior misidentifications, sufficed to permit the in-court identifications (see United States v Wade, 388 US 218). Under the circumstances of the case we do not find that defendant’s other contentions warrant a reversal. Lazer, J.P., Gibbons, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
81 A.D.2d 868, 438 N.Y.S.2d 882, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-burnett-nyappdiv-1981.