People v. Burkhardt
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Kurt Alan BURKHARDT, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 20, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would remand this case to the St. Joseph Circuit Court for resentencing because she believes the circuit court lacked authority to impose the judgment of sentence that orders restitution in the amount of $1,540 to pay for a home security system and related costs. A home security system in this case does not constitute actual medical service or a device relating to psychological care, as required by MCL 769.1a(4)(a) and MCL 780.766(4)(a).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
708 N.W.2d 438 (People v. Burkhardt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.