People v. Burke, Topel, Maniscalco
This text of 196 N.E. 585 (People v. Burke, Topel, Maniscalco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed; no opinion.
*572 Concur: Lehman, O’Brien, Crouch and Loughran, JJ. Not sitting: Finch, J. Crane, Ch. J., dissents in the following memorandum, in which Hubbs, J., concurs: Crane, Ch. J. (dissenting). For men and women to appear naked in a gymnasium, to which admittance is gained by the payment of a fee, in my judgment “ openly outrages public decency,” and is a violation of sections 43, 1140 and 1530 of the Penal Law. I dissent and vote for the affirmance of the convictions of these defendants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
196 N.E. 585, 267 N.Y. 571, 1935 N.Y. LEXIS 1298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-burke-topel-maniscalco-ny-1935.