People v. Burke, Topel, Maniscalco
196 N.E. 585, 267 N.Y. 571, 1935 N.Y. LEXIS 1298
Opinion
Judgment affirmed; no opinion.
*572 Concur: Lehman, O’Brien, Crouch and Loughran, JJ. Not sitting: Finch, J. Crane, Ch. J., dissents in the following memorandum, in which Hubbs, J., concurs: Crane, Ch. J. (dissenting). For men and women to appear naked in a gymnasium, to which admittance is gained by the payment of a fee, in my judgment “ openly outrages public decency,” and is a violation of sections 43, 1140 and 1530 of the Penal Law. I dissent and vote for the affirmance of the convictions of these defendants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Burke, Topel, Maniscalco, 196 N.E. 585, 267 N.Y. 571, 1935 N.Y. LEXIS 1298 (N.Y. 1935).
196 N.E. 585 (People v. Burke, Topel, Maniscalco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Craft
134 Misc. 2d 121 (Rochester City Court, 1986)
People v. Hardy
77 Misc. 2d 1092 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1974)
People v. Gilbert
72 Misc. 2d 75 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 1972)
State v. Nelson
178 N.W.2d 434 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1970)
In Re Davis
242 Cal. App. 2d 645 (California Court of Appeal, 1966)
Roberts v. Clement
252 F. Supp. 835 (E.D. Tennessee, 1966)
Trans-Lux Distributing Corp. v. Board of Regents of University of New York
198 N.E.2d 242 (New York Court of Appeals, 1964)
People v. Hildabridle
92 N.W.2d 6 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1958)
Excelsior Pictures Corp. v. Regents of the University
144 N.E.2d 31 (New York Court of Appeals, 1957)
People v. Casey
188 Misc. 352 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1946)