People v. Burke

240 A.D.2d 778, 659 N.Y.S.2d 807, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6028
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Burke. Read the opinion of the Court — 256 A.D.2d 1244

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Columbia County (Czajka, J.), rendered March 4, 1996, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of burglary in the second degree (six counts), burglary in the third degree (six counts) and petit larceny (six counts).

Defense counsel seeks to be relieved from further representing defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record and defense counsel’s brief, we agree. The record reveals that defendant entered into a knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea and that he was sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement. Accordingly, counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, White, Casey and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Burke, 240 A.D.2d 778, 659 N.Y.S.2d 807, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6028 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

240 A.D.2d 778 (People v. Burke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Cruwys
113 A.D.2d 979 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)