People v. Burke

115 A.D.2d 486, 496 N.Y.S.2d 364, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54877
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Burke. Read the opinion of the Court — 96 A.D.2d 971

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sharpe, J.), rendered October 14, 1982, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The trial court’s evidentiary rulings were either correct (see, People v Love, 92 AD2d 551) or the claimed errors were unpreserved for review and, if incorrect, constituted harmless error (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230; People v Johnson, 57 NY2d 969). Nor does the alleged prosecutorial misconduct warrant reversal (see, People v Caruso, 45 NY2d 881). The sentence imposed, although the maximum permissible, was not an abuse of discretion (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Gibbons, J. P., Bracken, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Burke, 115 A.D.2d 486, 496 N.Y.S.2d 364, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54877 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

115 A.D.2d 486 (People v. Burke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Johnson
443 N.E.2d 478 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
People v. Crimmins
326 N.E.2d 787 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Caruso
383 N.E.2d 109 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Love
92 A.D.2d 551 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)