People v. Burke
34 Cal. 661
This text of 34 Cal. 661 (People v. Burke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Burke, 34 Cal. 661 (Cal. 1868).
Opinion
The indictment is sufficient. The offense is charged in the words of the statute defining the crime of which the defendant was accused. (People v. Martin, 32 Cal. 91; People v. English, 30 Cal. 216; People v. Garcia, 25 Cal. 531.)
The affidavit of the defendant does not show sufficient diligence on his part to entitle him to a continuance. (People v. Williams, 24 Cal. 31.)
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sharp v. State
123 N.E. 161 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1919)
People v. Horvath
137 P. 1069 (California Court of Appeal, 1913)
People v. Rangod
44 P. 1071 (California Supreme Court, 1896)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
34 Cal. 661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-burke-cal-1868.