People v. Burk

220 A.D.2d 891, 649 N.Y.S.2d 340, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10195
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 19, 1995·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Columbia County (Leaman, J.), rendered February 28, 1994, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

After a jury trial, defendant was convicted of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and sentenced as a predicate felon to a prison term of 121/2 to 25 years. Defendant argues that County Court abused its discretion in considering defendant’s statement in which he denied possessing drugs as a factor in imposing the harshest possible sentence. Upon our review of the sentencing transcript, we do not find that County Court abused its discretion in sentencing defendant. County Court considered the subject statement as indicative of defendant’s lack of remorse for his actions. It also considered defendant’s past criminal history and the nature of the crime. Moreover, insofar as the cases relied upon by defendant involved sentences imposed in connection with plea agreements, we find them distinguishable from the case at hand (see, e.g., People v Carr, 135 AD2d 722; People v Daniels, 132 AD2d 667).

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, White, Casey and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Burk, 220 A.D.2d 891, 649 N.Y.S.2d 340, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10195 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

220 A.D.2d 891 (People v. Burk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Cato
5 A.D.3d 394 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)