People v. Burgos

123 A.D.3d 615, 996 N.Y.S.2d 917
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Burgos. Read the opinion of the Court — 90 A.D.3d 1670
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 23, 2014·No. 13823 2729/03·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene D. Goldberg, J.), entered on or about October 20, 2011, which adjudicated defendant a level two sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure to risk level one (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]). Defendant’s conduct and accomplishments while incarcerated were not so extraordinary as to warrant a departure from his presumptive risk level, given the seriousness of the underlying crime against a five-year-old child.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Friedman, Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Burgos, 123 A.D.3d 615, 996 N.Y.S.2d 917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

123 A.D.3d 615 (People v. Burgos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Gillotti
18 N.E.3d 701 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)