People v. Burgos

82 A.D.3d 550, 918 N.Y.2d 716
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Burgos. Read the opinion of the Court — 90 A.D.3d 1670

Opinion

Any error in declining defendant’s request for a consciousness of guilt charge does not warrant reversal, since the court’s charge as a whole gave the jury appropriate guidance and because any consciousness of guilt evidence was a minor component of the People’s case in light of the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt (see e.g. People v Valtin, 284 AD2d 203 [2001], lv denied 97 NY2d 643 [2001]). There is no reasonable possibility that a consciousness of guilt charge would have resulted in a different verdict. Concur — Gonzalez, EJ., Tom, Acosta, Richter and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Burgos, 82 A.D.3d 550, 918 N.Y.2d 716 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

82 A.D.3d 550 (People v. Burgos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Valtin
284 A.D.2d 203 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)