People v. Burgos

32 A.D.3d 1289, 821 N.Y.S.2d 528
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 29, 2006·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Kenneth R. Fisher, J.), entered January 6, 2005. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: On appeal from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.), defendant challenges only the assessment of 20 points. Even absent those 20 points, defendant’s total risk factor score results in a presumptive risk level classification of level three, and defendant failed to establish his entitlement to a downward departure from the presumptive risk level (see People v Hamelinck, 23 AD3d 1060 [2005]). Present — Scudder, J.P., Kehoe, Gorski, Smith and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Burgos, 32 A.D.3d 1289, 821 N.Y.S.2d 528 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

32 A.D.3d 1289 (People v. Burgos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

GREENE, ROBERT E., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012