People v. Burgett

15 A.D.2d 873, 225 N.Y.S.2d 261
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 22, 1962·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Memorandum:

The County Judge who passed upon appellant’s application was disqualified by reason of the fact that he was District Attorney of Ontario County at the time of appellant’s conviction. (Judiciary Law, § 14; People v. Morgan, 277 App. Div. 956; People v. Wurzler, 300 N. Y. 344.) In view of this disqualification he could not decide whether or not the matter was res judicata and lacked capacity to make the order appealed from. (Cf. Oakley v. Aspinwall, 3 N. Y. 547.) We do not pass upon the [874]*874issue of res judicata. It appears that appellant has never had the benefit of a review by an appellate court of the question tendered. Whether or not the doctrine of res judicata should be strictly applied by a court of original jurisdiction in a post-conviction proceeding is a question to be determined upon consideration of this application anew before another Judge. Cf. People ex rel. Baumgart v. Martin, 9 N Y 2d 351). (Appeal from order of Ontario County Court denying a motion to set aside a 1943 indictment.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Burgett, 15 A.D.2d 873, 225 N.Y.S.2d 261 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

15 A.D.2d 873 (People v. Burgett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Fardan
49 A.D.3d 1304 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Golston
13 A.D.3d 887 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
People v. Mitchell
137 Misc. 2d 450 (New York County Courts, 1987)