People v. Burgess
This text of 124 A.D.3d 790 (People v. Burgess) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*791 Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (DiMango, J.), rendered October 25, 2012, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree and resisting arrest, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Tomei, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s pretrial motion which was to suppress physical evidence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257 [2011]; People v Pressley, 116 AD3d 794 [2014]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his challenge to the Supreme Court’s suppression ruling.
However, on the merits, that branch of the defendant’s pretrial motion which was to suppress physical evidence was properly denied on the ground that there was probable cause to believe that the vehicle the defendant was driving contained crack cocaine (see People v Yancy, 86 NY2d 239, 245-246 [1995]; People v Guzman, 23 AD3d 579 [2005]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
124 A.D.3d 790, 998 N.Y.S.2d 655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-burgess-nyappdiv-2015.