People v. Burgess
88 A.D.3d 469, 930 N.Y.2d 442
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Burgess. Read the opinion of the Court — 81 A.D.3d 969 →
Opinion
The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]). Defendant may not challenge the voluntariness of his underlying guilty plea on this appeal (see People v Jordan, 16 NY3d 845 [2011]). Concur — Tom, J.E, Saxe, DeGrasse, Freedman and Román, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Burgess, 88 A.D.3d 469, 930 N.Y.2d 442 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
88 A.D.3d 469 (People v. Burgess) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Lingle
949 N.E.2d 952 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Jordan
947 N.E.2d 153 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)