People v. Burgess

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Burgess

102 A.D.2d 872, 477 N.Y.S.2d 307, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19083

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 18, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 102 A.D.2d 872 (People v. Burgess) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Burgess, 102 A.D.2d 872, 477 N.Y.S.2d 307, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19083 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jaspan, J.), rendered July 27, 1982, convicting him of grand larceny in the second degree and criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, after a nonjury trial, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 60 days’ imprisonment and five years’ probation, the periods of imprisonment being a condition of and running concurrently with the periods of probation. 1i Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by deleting from the sentences imposed the condition of imprisonment. As so modified, judgment affirmed, and case remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings pursuant to GPL 460.50 (subd 5). H We deem the sentences, as reduced, to be more appropriate under the circumstances of this case. We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit (see People v Mitchell, 58 NY2d 368). Titone, J. P., Gibbons, O’Connor and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jaspan, J.), rendered July 27, 1982, convicting him of grand larceny in the second degree and criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, after a nonjury trial, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 60 days’ imprisonment and five years’ probation, the periods of imprisonment being a condition of and running concurrently with the periods of probation. 1i Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by deleting from the sentences imposed the condition of imprisonment. As so modified, judgment affirmed, and case remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings pursuant to GPL 460.50 (subd 5). H We deem the sentences, as reduced, to be more appropriate under the circumstances of this case. We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit (see People v Mitchell, 58 NY2d 368). Titone, J. P., Gibbons, O’Connor and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 A.D.2d 872, 477 N.Y.S.2d 307, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19083, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-burgess-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack