People v. Burden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Burden

164 A.D.2d 866, 559 N.Y.S.2d 813, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10169

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 6, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 164 A.D.2d 866 (People v. Burden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Burden, 164 A.D.2d 866, 559 N.Y.S.2d 813, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10169 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Zweibel, J.), rendered June 24, 1988, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the court erred in accepting his plea of guilty because his plea allocution was inadequate is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636; People v Shukar, 135 AD2d 671). In any event the record reveals that the plea allocution was adequate.

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Mangano, P. J., Kunzeman, Kooper, Sullivan and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Zweibel, J.), rendered June 24, 1988, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the court erred in accepting his plea of guilty because his plea allocution was inadequate is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636; People v Shukar, 135 AD2d 671). In any event the record reveals that the plea allocution was adequate.

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Mangano, P. J., Kunzeman, Kooper, Sullivan and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

164 A.D.2d 866, 559 N.Y.S.2d 813, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-burden-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack