People v. Burch

272 A.D.2d 855, 708 N.Y.S.2d 686, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5323
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 10, 2000·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Viewing the evidence, the law and the circumstances of this case in totality and as of the time of the representation, we conclude that defendant received meaningful representation (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147). Although defendant’s representation was not error free, defendant failed to demonstrate that he was “deprived of a fair trial by less than meaningful representation” (People v Flores, 84 NY2d 184, 187). We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Chautauqua County Court, Noonan, J. — Aggravated Sexual Abuse, 2nd Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Wisner, Scudder and Law-ton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Burch, 272 A.D.2d 855, 708 N.Y.S.2d 686, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5323 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

272 A.D.2d 855 (People v. Burch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burch v. Millas
663 F. Supp. 2d 151 (W.D. New York, 2009)