People v. Burch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Burch

272 A.D.2d 855, 708 N.Y.S.2d 686, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5323

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 10, 2000

DocketAppeal No. 1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 272 A.D.2d 855 (People v. Burch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Burch, 272 A.D.2d 855, 708 N.Y.S.2d 686, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5323 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Viewing the evidence, the law and the circumstances of this case in totality and as of the time of the representation, we conclude that defendant received meaningful representation (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147). Although defendant’s representation was not error free, defendant failed to demonstrate that he was “deprived of a fair trial by less than meaningful representation” (People v Flores, 84 NY2d 184, 187). We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Chautauqua County Court, Noonan, J. — Aggravated Sexual Abuse, 2nd Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Wisner, Scudder and Law-ton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Viewing the evidence, the law and the circumstances of this case in totality and as of the time of the representation, we conclude that defendant received meaningful representation (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147). Although defendant’s representation was not error free, defendant failed to demonstrate that he was “deprived of a fair trial by less than meaningful representation” (People v Flores, 84 NY2d 184, 187). We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Chautauqua County Court, Noonan, J. — Aggravated Sexual Abuse, 2nd Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Wisner, Scudder and Law-ton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 855, 708 N.Y.S.2d 686, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-burch-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack