People v. Buqueras

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Buqueras

51 A.D.3d 1224, 856 N.Y.S.2d 491

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 2008

StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.D.3d 1224 (People v. Buqueras) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Buqueras, 51 A.D.3d 1224, 856 N.Y.S.2d 491 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Hayden, J.), rendered November 17, 2006, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and was thereafter sentenced, in accordance with the plea agreement, to two years in prison and three years of postrelease supervision. Defendant now appeals, arguing that the sentence imposed was harsh and excessive. We disagree. On the record before us, we do not find that County Court abused its discretion or that there are any extraordinary circumstances warranting a modification of the sentence in the interest of justice (see People v Ryan, 46 AD3d 1125, 1128 [2007]). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

Spain, J.E, Carpinello, Malone Jr., Kavanagh and Stein, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Hayden, J.), rendered November 17, 2006, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and was thereafter sentenced, in accordance with the plea agreement, to two years in prison and three years of postrelease supervision. Defendant now appeals, arguing that the sentence imposed was harsh and excessive. We disagree. On the record before us, we do not find that County Court abused its discretion or that there are any extraordinary circumstances warranting a modification of the sentence in the interest of justice (see People v Ryan, 46 AD3d 1125, 1128 [2007]). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

Spain, J.E, Carpinello, Malone Jr., Kavanagh and Stein, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.3d 1224, 856 N.Y.S.2d 491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-buqueras-nyappdiv-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack