People v. Bunting

2025 NY Slip Op 06615
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 26, 2025
Docket2024-11916
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 06615 (People v. Bunting) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Bunting, 2025 NY Slip Op 06615 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

People v Bunting (2025 NY Slip Op 06615)

People v Bunting
2025 NY Slip Op 06615
Decided on November 26, 2025
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on November 26, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
COLLEEN D. DUFFY, J.P.
PAUL WOOTEN
PHILLIP HOM
ELENA GOLDBERG VELAZQUEZ, JJ.

2024-11916

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Christophe A. Bunting, appellant. (S.C.I. No. 71984/24)


Samuel S. Coe, White Plains, NY, for appellant.

Susan Cacace, District Attorney, White Plains, NY (Jill Oziemblewski of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Evan Inlaw, J.), rendered October 22, 2024, convicting him of attempted robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 255), as well as his contention that the sentence constituted cruel and unusual punishment (see People v Archer, 239 AD3d 763, 764; People v Escobargarcia, 237 AD3d 1221, 1222).

DUFFY, J.P., WOOTEN, HOM and GOLDBERG VELAZQUEZ, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 06615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bunting-nyappdiv-2025.