People v. Bunn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bunn

302 A.D.2d 924, 753 N.Y.S.2d 797, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1039

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 7, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 302 A.D.2d 924 (People v. Bunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bunn, 302 A.D.2d 924, 753 N.Y.S.2d 797, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1039 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of Yates County Court (Falvey, J.), entered September 4, 2001, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of, inter alia, grand larceny in the third degree.

[925]*925It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: The contention of defendant that she was denied effective assistance of counsel does not survive her guilty plea because “[t]here is no showing that the plea bargaining process was infected by any allegedly ineffective assistance or that defendant entered the plea because of [her] attorney [’s] allegedly poor performance” (People v Burke, 256 AD2d 1244, 1244, lv denied 93 NY2d 851; see People v Remp, 294 AD2d 823). The waiver by defendant of the right to appeal encompasses her contention concerning the severity of the sentence (see People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737). Present — Pine, J.P., Wisner, Kehoe, Burns and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of Yates County Court (Falvey, J.), entered September 4, 2001, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of, inter alia, grand larceny in the third degree.

[925]*925It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: The contention of defendant that she was denied effective assistance of counsel does not survive her guilty plea because “[t]here is no showing that the plea bargaining process was infected by any allegedly ineffective assistance or that defendant entered the plea because of [her] attorney [’s] allegedly poor performance” (People v Burke, 256 AD2d 1244, 1244, lv denied 93 NY2d 851; see People v Remp, 294 AD2d 823). The waiver by defendant of the right to appeal encompasses her contention concerning the severity of the sentence (see People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737). Present — Pine, J.P., Wisner, Kehoe, Burns and Gorski, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

302 A.D.2d 924, 753 N.Y.S.2d 797, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1039, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bunn-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack