People v. Buniek

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Buniek

65 A.D.3d 1258, 885 N.Y.S.2d 429

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 22, 2009·Published

Opinion

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated June 10, 2008 (People v Buniek, 52 AD3d 621 [2008]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, rendered February 8, 2005.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the [1259] effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Rivera, J.P., Spolzino, Dickerson and Eng, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated June 10, 2008 (People v Buniek, 52 AD3d 621 [2008]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, rendered February 8, 2005.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the [1259] effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Rivera, J.P., Spolzino, Dickerson and Eng, JJ., concur.

People v. Buniek, 65 A.D.3d 1258, 885 N.Y.S.2d 429 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

65 A.D.3d 1258 (People v. Buniek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related