People v. Bumford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bumford

199 A.D.2d 329, 606 N.Y.S.2d 994

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 13, 1993·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from four sentences of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Clabby, J.), all imposed August 12, 1991.

Ordered that the sentences are affirmed.

We find that the defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal his sentences was not valid (see, People v DeSimone, 80 NY2d 273, 282-283).

We have examined the defendant’s contention that the sentences were excessive and find it to be without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, Lawrence, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from four sentences of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Clabby, J.), all imposed August 12, 1991.

Ordered that the sentences are affirmed.

We find that the defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal his sentences was not valid (see, People v DeSimone, 80 NY2d 273, 282-283).

We have examined the defendant’s contention that the sentences were excessive and find it to be without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, Lawrence, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.

People v. Bumford, 199 A.D.2d 329, 606 N.Y.S.2d 994 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

199 A.D.2d 329 (People v. Bumford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related