People v. Bumford

199 A.D.2d 329, 606 N.Y.S.2d 994

This text of 199 A.D.2d 329 (People v. Bumford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Bumford, 199 A.D.2d 329, 606 N.Y.S.2d 994 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from four sentences of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Clabby, J.), all imposed August 12, 1991.

Ordered that the sentences are affirmed.

We find that the defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal his sentences was not valid (see, People v DeSimone, 80 NY2d 273, 282-283).

We have examined the defendant’s contention that the sentences were excessive and find it to be without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, Lawrence, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Callahan
80 N.Y.2d 273 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 A.D.2d 329, 606 N.Y.S.2d 994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bumford-nyappdiv-1993.