People v. Bumberger

45 Cal. 650
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1873
DocketNo. 10,025
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 45 Cal. 650 (People v. Bumberger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Bumberger, 45 Cal. 650 (Cal. 1873).

Opinion

By the Court:

The only points made relate to the charge given by the Court to the jury. Subdivision six of section one thousand and ninety-three of the Penal Code provides that the “ charge must be reduced to writing before it is given, unless by the mutual consent of the parties it is given orally, or unless it is fully taken down by the reporter of the Court at the time it is given.”

It appears from the record that the Court charged the jury orally, “ a written charge being waived.” It also appears that “ counsel for the respective parties having expressly waived a written charge, the Court charged the jury as follows;” and then the charge is given at length in the transcript.

There can be no just pretense that the charge was not given orally by the mutual consent of the parties; and if there could be, we should still necessarily presume from the fact of its appearing in the record, that it was fully taken down by the reporter at the time it was given.

There was no impropriety in the remarks made by the Court to the jury on the subject of insanity. They were a just caution to the jury to be careful that no pretended case of insanity should be allowed to shield a man from the ordinary consequences of his own acts, while at the same time the jury were in effect told that if one has really committed an act which was the result of a diseased or unsound mind, the defense of insanity would be a good one, and he ought to have the full benefit of it.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Sloper
244 P. 362 (California Supreme Court, 1926)
People v. Stein
137 P. 271 (California Court of Appeal, 1913)
People v. Donlan
67 P. 761 (California Supreme Court, 1902)
People v. Methever
64 P. 481 (California Supreme Court, 1901)
People v. Allender
48 P. 1014 (California Supreme Court, 1897)
People v. McCarthy
46 P. 1073 (California Supreme Court, 1896)
People v. Larrabee
46 P. 922 (California Supreme Court, 1896)
Aszman v. State
8 L.R.A. 33 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1890)
Territory v. Lopez
3 N.M. 104 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1884)
People v. Ferris
55 Cal. 588 (California Supreme Court, 1880)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 Cal. 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bumberger-cal-1873.