People v. Bultron

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bultron

73 A.D.2d 692, 423 N.Y.S.2d 230, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14565

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 31, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 73 A.D.2d 692 (People v. Bultron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bultron, 73 A.D.2d 692, 423 N.Y.S.2d 230, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14565 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered May 13, 1977, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial ordered. Defendant was charged with the crime of murder in the second degree (felony murder). Although defendant testified at trial that he was guilty of the crime charged, his pretrial confession, which was introduced into evidence, potentially set forth the affirmative defense to felony murder contained in subdivision 3 of section 125.25 of the Penal Law. A factual question was presented for the jury’s determination. Under these circumstances, the erroneous charge to the jury that the application of the affirmative defense was discretionary constituted reversible error (see People v Santanella, 63 AD2d 744; People v Vinniane, 70 AD2d 956). We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. O’Connor, J. P., Mangano, Rabin and Gibbons, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered May 13, 1977, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial ordered. Defendant was charged with the crime of murder in the second degree (felony murder). Although defendant testified at trial that he was guilty of the crime charged, his pretrial confession, which was introduced into evidence, potentially set forth the affirmative defense to felony murder contained in subdivision 3 of section 125.25 of the Penal Law. A factual question was presented for the jury’s determination. Under these circumstances, the erroneous charge to the jury that the application of the affirmative defense was discretionary constituted reversible error (see People v Santanella, 63 AD2d 744; People v Vinniane, 70 AD2d 956). We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. O’Connor, J. P., Mangano, Rabin and Gibbons, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 A.D.2d 692, 423 N.Y.S.2d 230, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bultron-nyappdiv-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack