People v. Buckman

55 A.D.3d 1361, 864 N.Y.S.2d 358
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Buckman. Read the opinion of the Court — 66 A.D.3d 1400

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Livingston County Court (Joan S. Kohout, J.), rendered October 20, 2006. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [1]). By pleading guilty, defendant forfeited his contention concerning the People’s alleged failure to comply with the notice requirements of CPL 710.30 (see People v Taylor, 65 NY2d 1, 6-7 [1985]; People v La Bar, 16 AD3d 1084 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 764 [2005]). We have considered defendant’s remaining contention and conclude that it is without merit. Present—Scudder, P.J., Hurlbutt, Martoche, Smith and Lunn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Buckman, 55 A.D.3d 1361, 864 N.Y.S.2d 358 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

55 A.D.3d 1361 (People v. Buckman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. La Bar
16 A.D.3d 1084 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)