People v. Buckley

California Supreme Court

People v. Buckley

49 Cal. 241

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1874

DocketNo. 10,096

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 49 Cal. 241 (People v. Buckley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Buckley, 49 Cal. 241 (Cal. 1874).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court, McKinstry, J.:

The verdict is good. When the jury ' ‘ agree ” they ‘' find ” if they return their agreement into Court. The verdict would have been sufficient if it had been simply “Guilty of murder in the second degree.”

The defendant challenged a juror thus: “I challenge the juror for implied bias.” This was not a proper specification of the grounds of challenge. (People v. Reynolds, 16 Cal. 130; People v. Renfrow 41 Cal. 37.)

Judgment and order affirmed.

Neither Mr. Justice Crockett nor Mr. Justice Rhodes expressed an opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court, McKinstry, J.:

The verdict is good. When the jury ' ‘ agree ” they ‘' find ” if they return their agreement into Court. The verdict would have been sufficient if it had been simply “Guilty of murder in the second degree.”

The defendant challenged a juror thus: “I challenge the juror for implied bias.” This was not a proper specification of the grounds of challenge. (People v. Reynolds, 16 Cal. 130; People v. Renfrow 41 Cal. 37.)

Judgment and order affirmed.

Neither Mr. Justice Crockett nor Mr. Justice Rhodes expressed an opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 Cal. 241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-buckley-cal-1874.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack