People v. Buckley
49 Cal. 241
Opinion
The verdict is good. When the jury ' ‘ agree ” they ‘' find ” if they return their agreement into Court. The verdict would have been sufficient if it had been simply “Guilty of murder in the second degree.”
The defendant challenged a juror thus: “I challenge the juror for implied bias.” This was not a proper specification of the grounds of challenge. (People v. Reynolds, 16 Cal. 130; People v. Renfrow 41 Cal. 37.)
Judgment and order affirmed.
Neither Mr. Justice Crockett nor Mr. Justice Rhodes expressed an opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Buckley, 49 Cal. 241 (Cal. 1874).
49 Cal. 241 (People v. Buckley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Prieto CA5
California Court of Appeal, 2016
Simons v. Jennings
46 P.2d 704 (Montana Supreme Court, 1935)
People v. Owens
56 P. 251 (California Supreme Court, 1899)
Southern Pac. Co. v. Rauh
49 F. 696 (Ninth Circuit, 1892)