People v. Buckhannon
This text of 108 A.D.2d 818 (People v. Buckhannon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sherman, J.), both rendered December 9, 1983, convicting him of robbery in the second degree under indictment No. 1369/83 and attempted robbery in the third degree under indictment No. 1370/83, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.
Judgments affirmed.
The defendant’s present challenge to the sufficiency of his allocution at the time he entered his pleas of guilty was not preserved for appellate review as a matter of law (CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). In any event, we find the plea allocutions to be satisfactory (People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9). Moreover, the sentences imposed were lawful and appropriate and accordingly will not be disturbed (People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Titone, J. P., Thompson, O’Connor and Eiber, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
108 A.D.2d 818, 485 N.Y.S.2d 294, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-buckhannon-nyappdiv-1985.