People v. Bucinell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bucinell

167 A.D.2d 661, 564 N.Y.S.2d 203, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13602

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 167 A.D.2d 661 (People v. Bucinell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bucinell, 167 A.D.2d 661, 564 N.Y.S.2d 203, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13602 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Monserrate, J.), rendered February 6, 1989, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crime of bail jumping in the second degree.

Contrary to defendant’s claim, County Court properly directed that defendant’s sentence, as a second felony offender to a prison term of 1 Vi to 3 years for bail jumping in the second degree, be served consecutively to a sentence previously imposed for forgery in the second degree (see, People v McManus, 124 AD2d 305). In pleading guilty to both of these charges, six other charges against defendant were dropped and it was agreed that the sentences imposed would be served [662]*662consecutively (see, People v Perrotti, 153 AD2d 992, lv denied 75 NY2d 774). Under these circumstances, defendant’s contention that the sentence is harsh and excessive lacks merit (see, People v Gholston, 130 AD2d 843, lv denied 70 NY2d 799).

Judgment affirmed. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Monserrate, J.), rendered February 6, 1989, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crime of bail jumping in the second degree.

Contrary to defendant’s claim, County Court properly directed that defendant’s sentence, as a second felony offender to a prison term of 1 Vi to 3 years for bail jumping in the second degree, be served consecutively to a sentence previously imposed for forgery in the second degree (see, People v McManus, 124 AD2d 305). In pleading guilty to both of these charges, six other charges against defendant were dropped and it was agreed that the sentences imposed would be served [662]*662consecutively (see, People v Perrotti, 153 AD2d 992, lv denied 75 NY2d 774). Under these circumstances, defendant’s contention that the sentence is harsh and excessive lacks merit (see, People v Gholston, 130 AD2d 843, lv denied 70 NY2d 799).

Judgment affirmed. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

167 A.D.2d 661, 564 N.Y.S.2d 203, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bucinell-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack