People v. Bryant

125 A.D.3d 683, 999 N.Y.S.2d 752
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Bryant. Read the opinion of the Court — 93 A.D.3d 1344
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 4, 2015·No. 2013-03723·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chun, J.), imposed February 20, 2013, upon his conviction of attempted murder in the first degree, manslaughter in the second degree, attempted robbery in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, the resentence being a period of postrelease supervision in addition to the determinate terms of imprisonment previously imposed by the same court (Reichbach, J.) on March 14, 2007.

Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.

Since the defendant was still serving his original sentence when the resentence was imposed, the resentence to a term including the statutorily required period of postrelease supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right *684 to due process of law (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621, 630-633 [2011]; People v Kearney, 116 AD3d 1064 [2014]; People v Flowers, 116 AD3d 710 [2014]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit.

Dillon, J.P., Chambers, Austin and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bryant, 125 A.D.3d 683, 999 N.Y.S.2d 752 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

125 A.D.3d 683 (People v. Bryant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lingle
949 N.E.2d 952 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Flowers
116 A.D.3d 710 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Kearney
116 A.D.3d 1064 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)