People v. Bryant

209 A.D.2d 286, 619 N.Y.S.2d 541, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11372
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Bryant. Read the opinion of the Court — 180 A.D.2d 874

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Frank Diaz, J.), rendered March 18, 1992, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the first degree, and sentencing him to a prison term of from 4 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is unsupported by any record that might have been developed had an appropriate post-judgment motion been made pursuant to CPL 440.10 (People v Love, 57 NY2d 998, 1000). On the present state of the record, we do not find that defendant’s trial representation was incompetent (People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137). We also note that it is unlikely that the trial would have had a different outcome but for counsel’s few errors (People v Matos, 183 AD2d 506, lv denied 80 NY2d 896). Nor do we perceive any abuse of discretion in sentencing. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Ross, Rubin and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bryant, 209 A.D.2d 286, 619 N.Y.S.2d 541, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11372 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

209 A.D.2d 286 (People v. Bryant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Love
443 N.E.2d 486 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Matos
183 A.D.2d 506 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)