People v. Bryant

170 A.D.2d 1039, 566 N.Y.S.2d 893, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1809
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 1, 1991·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Upon remittitur for a reconstruction hearing (People v Bryant, 159 AD2d 962), the court found that the prosecutor gave a racially neutral explanation for his peremptory challenge to the single black potential juror. That determination is supported by the record (see, People v James, 138 AD2d 971, lv denied 72 NY2d 920). We find defendant’s remaining argument, that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence, to be lacking in merit (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). (Resubmission of appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, Dillon, J.—Rape, 1st Degree.) Present— Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bryant, 170 A.D.2d 1039, 566 N.Y.S.2d 893, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1809 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

170 A.D.2d 1039 (People v. Bryant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bryant v. Speckard
929 F. Supp. 640 (W.D. New York, 1996)