People v. Brunson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Brunson

294 A.D.2d 104, 740 N.Y.S.2d 866, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4348

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 2, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 294 A.D.2d 104 (People v. Brunson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Brunson, 294 A.D.2d 104, 740 N.Y.S.2d 866, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4348 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Beeler, J.), rendered October 18, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the second degree, menacing in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, petit larceny and resisting arrest, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of five years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. Defendant’s larcenous intent could readily be inferred from the circumstances, including the fact that he had unpaid merchandise, along with a detached security tag, in a shopping bag and attempted to flee after being confronted by store security officers (see, People v Castillo, 47 NY2d 270, 278). Concur—Saxe, J.P., Buckley, Rosenberger, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Beeler, J.), rendered October 18, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the second degree, menacing in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, petit larceny and resisting arrest, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of five years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. Defendant’s larcenous intent could readily be inferred from the circumstances, including the fact that he had unpaid merchandise, along with a detached security tag, in a shopping bag and attempted to flee after being confronted by store security officers (see, People v Castillo, 47 NY2d 270, 278). Concur—Saxe, J.P., Buckley, Rosenberger, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

294 A.D.2d 104, 740 N.Y.S.2d 866, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-brunson-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack