People v. Brunson

149 A.D.2d 940, 543 N.Y.S.2d 342, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5952
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Brunson. Read the opinion of the Court — 131 A.D.2d 689

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The Fourth Amendment claims raised by defendant were resolved on the appeal of his codefendant (see, People v Simmons, 101 AD2d 1032). Determination of which prior crimes may be introduced to impeach a defendant is within the sound discretion of the trial court (see, People v Armstrong, 148 AD2d 963) and the court’s Sandoval ruling was not an abuse of that discretion. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Marks, J. — burglary, third degree; petit larceny.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Denman, Green and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Brunson, 149 A.D.2d 940, 543 N.Y.S.2d 342, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5952 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

149 A.D.2d 940 (People v. Brunson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Armstrong
148 A.D.2d 963 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)