People v. Bruno

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bruno

30 A.D.3d 688, 815 N.Y.S.2d 830

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 8, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 30 A.D.3d 688 (People v. Bruno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bruno, 30 A.D.3d 688, 815 N.Y.S.2d 830 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County (LaBuda, J.), rendered May 31, 2005, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the third degree.

Defendant, waiving his right to appeal, pleaded guilty to bur[689]*689glary in the third degree and was sentenced as a second felony offender to a prison term of 3V2 to 7 years. On appeal, appellate counsel for defendant seeks to be relieved of her assignment on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues which can be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record and appellate counsel’s brief, we agree. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and appellate counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Her cure, J.R, Crew III, Peters, Spain and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County (LaBuda, J.), rendered May 31, 2005, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the third degree.

Defendant, waiving his right to appeal, pleaded guilty to bur[689]*689glary in the third degree and was sentenced as a second felony offender to a prison term of 3V2 to 7 years. On appeal, appellate counsel for defendant seeks to be relieved of her assignment on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues which can be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record and appellate counsel’s brief, we agree. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and appellate counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Her cure, J.R, Crew III, Peters, Spain and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.D.3d 688, 815 N.Y.S.2d 830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bruno-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack