People v. Bruno

290 A.D.2d 306, 735 N.Y.S.2d 774, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 302
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Bruno. Read the opinion of the Court — 300 A.D.2d 93

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Obús, J.), rendered March 3, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 10 to 20 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s motions to suppress an oral statement and two written confessions made to the police were properly denied. All three statements were preceded by proper Miranda warnings and waivers. The brief interval between the warnings and the oral statement did not require renewed warnings (People v Irizarry, 199 AD2d 180, lv denied 83 NY2d 872). Under the totality of circumstances (see, Arizona v Fulminante, 499 US 279; People v Anderson, 42 NY2d 35, 38), the first written confession was not rendered involuntary by the circumstance that defendant was briefly in a state of partial undress due to the discovery of blood stains on several articles of his clothing, necessitating their removal for testing.

We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence. Concur— Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Sullivan and Ellerin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bruno, 290 A.D.2d 306, 735 N.Y.S.2d 774, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 302 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

290 A.D.2d 306 (People v. Bruno) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arizona v. Fulminante
499 U.S. 279 (Supreme Court, 1991)
People v. Anderson
364 N.E.2d 1318 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)
People v. Irizarry
199 A.D.2d 180 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)