People v. Bruno

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bruno

192 A.D.2d 541, 596 N.Y.S.2d 724, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3402

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 5, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 192 A.D.2d 541 (People v. Bruno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bruno, 192 A.D.2d 541, 596 N.Y.S.2d 724, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3402 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from (1) seven judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Savarse, J.), all rendered September 7, 1990, convicting him of burglary in the third degree (two counts; one each as to Indictment Nos. 6396/89 and 6534/89), and [542]*542robbery in the first degree (five counts; one each as to Indictment Nos. 2332/90, 2333/90, 2334/90, 2335/90, and 2386/90), and (2) from an amended judgment of the same court, also rendered September 7, 1990, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon his admission that he had violated a condition thereof, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of attempted robbery in the second degree under Indictment No. 7806/87.

Ordered that the judgments and amended judgment are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Lawrence, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from (1) seven judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Savarse, J.), all rendered September 7, 1990, convicting him of burglary in the third degree (two counts; one each as to Indictment Nos. 6396/89 and 6534/89), and [542]*542robbery in the first degree (five counts; one each as to Indictment Nos. 2332/90, 2333/90, 2334/90, 2335/90, and 2386/90), and (2) from an amended judgment of the same court, also rendered September 7, 1990, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon his admission that he had violated a condition thereof, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of attempted robbery in the second degree under Indictment No. 7806/87.

Ordered that the judgments and amended judgment are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Lawrence, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 A.D.2d 541, 596 N.Y.S.2d 724, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bruno-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack