People v. Bruni

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bruni

167 A.D.2d 890, 563 N.Y.S.2d 697, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14457

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 16, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 167 A.D.2d 890 (People v. Bruni) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bruni, 167 A.D.2d 890, 563 N.Y.S.2d 697, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14457 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: At the time of his arraignment, defendant was furnished with a copy of the eavesdropping warrant and the accompanying application under which the interception was [891]*891approved (see, CPL 700.70; People v Schulz, 67 NY2d 144). Consequently, the People complied with the notice requirements of CPL 700.70.

Further, the People demonstrated that the sealing requirements of CPL article 700 were met (cf., People v Nicoletti, 34 NY2d 249) and the minimization procedures that were established and followed were appropriate (see, People v Floyd, 41 NY2d 245). We find that the sentence imposed was not harsh and excessive. (Appeal from judgment of Ontario County Court, Henry, Jr., J.—criminal possession of controlled substance, second degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Denman, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: At the time of his arraignment, defendant was furnished with a copy of the eavesdropping warrant and the accompanying application under which the interception was [891]*891approved (see, CPL 700.70; People v Schulz, 67 NY2d 144). Consequently, the People complied with the notice requirements of CPL 700.70.

Further, the People demonstrated that the sealing requirements of CPL article 700 were met (cf., People v Nicoletti, 34 NY2d 249) and the minimization procedures that were established and followed were appropriate (see, People v Floyd, 41 NY2d 245). We find that the sentence imposed was not harsh and excessive. (Appeal from judgment of Ontario County Court, Henry, Jr., J.—criminal possession of controlled substance, second degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Denman, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

167 A.D.2d 890, 563 N.Y.S.2d 697, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bruni-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack