People v. Bruner

186 A.D.2d 997, 590 N.Y.S.2d 815, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11529
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 7, 1992·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court did not err when it sentenced defendant in absentia. Defendant had been informed of the scheduled date for sentencing but, rather than appearing, chose to abscond to Texas. Defendant’s flight from the jurisdiction unambiguously indicated "a defiance of the processes of law sufficient to effect a forfeiture” of his right to be present at sentencing (People v Sanchez, 65 NY2d 436, 444; see also, People v Corley, 67 NY2d 105, 109-110).

We have examined defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Cattaraugus County Court, Kelly, J. — Violation of Probation.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Green, Pine, Boehm and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bruner, 186 A.D.2d 997, 590 N.Y.S.2d 815, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11529 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

186 A.D.2d 997 (People v. Bruner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Roe
49 Misc. 3d 1099 (New York Supreme Court, 2015)