People v. Bruckman
This text of 389 N.E.2d 1105 (People v. Bruckman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Inasmuch as defendant failed to object to the verdict as returned by the jury, his claim of repugnancy was not preserved for appellate review. (See People v Parks, 59 AD2d 543, 544; People v Incherchera, 56 AD2d 852; cf. Matter of Oliver v Justices of N. Y. Supreme Ct. of N. Y. County, 36 NY2d 53, 58; People v Quilles, 48 AD2d 933.)
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
389 N.E.2d 1105, 46 N.Y.2d 1020, 416 N.Y.S.2d 585, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 1940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bruckman-ny-1979.