Home/New York Court of Appeals/People v. Bruckman

People v. Bruckman

389 N.E.2d 1105, 46 N.Y.2d 1020, 416 N.Y.S.2d 585, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 1940
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 29, 1979·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Inasmuch as defendant failed to object to the verdict as returned by the jury, his claim of repugnancy was not preserved for appellate review. (See People v Parks, 59 AD2d 543, 544; People v Incherchera, 56 AD2d 852; cf. Matter of Oliver v Justices of N. Y. Supreme Ct. of N. Y. County, 36 NY2d 53, 58; People v Quilles, 48 AD2d 933.)

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bruckman, 389 N.E.2d 1105, 46 N.Y.2d 1020, 416 N.Y.S.2d 585, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 1940 (N.Y. 1979).

389 N.E.2d 1105 (People v. Bruckman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hamilton
138 A.D.2d 625 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. Sanchez
128 A.D.2d 377 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
People v. Hankinson
119 A.D.2d 506 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
People v. Morris
109 A.D.2d 413 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
People v. Roberts
112 A.D.2d 18 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
People v. Lee
102 A.D.2d 540 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
People v. Barry
100 A.D.2d 803 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
People v. McDavis
97 A.D.2d 302 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
People v. Bruckman
436 N.E.2d 1336 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
People v. Stahl
425 N.E.2d 876 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)