People v. Bruce D.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bruce D.

67 A.D.2d 716, 412 N.Y.S.2d 581, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10337

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 22, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 67 A.D.2d 716 (People v. Bruce D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bruce D., 67 A.D.2d 716, 412 N.Y.S.2d 581, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10337 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Putnam County, rendered June 9, 1978, which adjudicated him a youthful offender upon his conviction of burglary in the third degree and petit larceny, on a plea of guilty, and sentenced him to 60 days in prison and 58 months on probation, "to run concurrently with all charges” against him in Putnam County. Judgment modified as a matter of discretion in the interests of justice, by reducing the sentence to five years’ probation upon the same terms as previously imposed. As so modified, judgment affirmed. The sentence imposed was excessive to the extent indicated. Gulotta, J. P., Shapiro, Cohalan and Hargett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Putnam County, rendered June 9, 1978, which adjudicated him a youthful offender upon his conviction of burglary in the third degree and petit larceny, on a plea of guilty, and sentenced him to 60 days in prison and 58 months on probation, "to run concurrently with all charges” against him in Putnam County. Judgment modified as a matter of discretion in the interests of justice, by reducing the sentence to five years’ probation upon the same terms as previously imposed. As so modified, judgment affirmed. The sentence imposed was excessive to the extent indicated. Gulotta, J. P., Shapiro, Cohalan and Hargett, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 A.D.2d 716, 412 N.Y.S.2d 581, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bruce-d-nyappdiv-1979.