People v. Browne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Browne

259 A.D.2d 286, 684 N.Y.S.2d 782, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2267

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 4, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D.2d 286 (People v. Browne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Browne, 259 A.D.2d 286, 684 N.Y.S.2d 782, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2267 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Tejada, J.), rendered October 17, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of kidnapping in the first degree, attempted murder in the second degree and assault in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 15 years to life, 10 to 20 years, and 3V2 to 7 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s various challenges to the People’s summation are unpreserved, and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that the remarks in question were proper when viewed in the context of defendant’s summation (People v Halm, 81 NY2d 819). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Lerner, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Tejada, J.), rendered October 17, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of kidnapping in the first degree, attempted murder in the second degree and assault in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 15 years to life, 10 to 20 years, and 3V2 to 7 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s various challenges to the People’s summation are unpreserved, and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that the remarks in question were proper when viewed in the context of defendant’s summation (People v Halm, 81 NY2d 819). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Lerner, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D.2d 286, 684 N.Y.S.2d 782, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-browne-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack